Tag Archives: VPN

Enforcing Network Policy Internally, Remotely And To Mobile Devices

 Enforcing Network Policy Internally, Remotely And To Mobile DevicesMany corporations fail to establish and enforce a network policy. A network policy is a set of conditions, limitations, and customized settings designed to control how authorized subjects use network resources. Common examples of a network policy are controlling access to adult, gambling, hacking, blacklisted and other website categories that violate human resource (HR) and security standards. Network Policy requirements can change based on device type, time of day and user role. Its key that network policy is automatically enforced rather than something end-users choose to abide by or most likely will fail when most needed.

Users are the weakest link in any network. Hackers know this and target the majority of attacks at this vulnerability. I constantly hear customers complain about phishing attacks (users clicking a link in a email) or users bringing devices infected with malware most likely obtained while surfing websites that violate network policy. Its also common to see users violate security controls if it impacts their work flow. I had one audit identify internal users VPNing from their workstations to bypass internal network policy due to lack of controls for remote users. Poorly enforced policies will impact your security, reduce workflow and become very costly as a result of failed audits and compromised systems.

Common solutions for enforcing network policy are layer 7 / application layer firewalls, content filters and bolt-on technology such as cloud applications or agent technology that control network traffic from end-points. I wrote a post about the concepts behind web-gateway solutions HERE. The standard offering provides content categories (Gambling, Social Networks, Hate, Sex, etc.) that can be denied, limited or monitored. The more advanced solutions include security components such as anti-virus / anti-malware, layer-4 monitoring, website reputation scoring and other features.

The problem with these solutions is scalability. Most content filers require either user devices to be configured inline (hardcoding proxy settings) or routing traffic to the device (example WCCP). These solutions become difficult to enforce outside of the internal network as well as on devices that are not cooperate assets such as mobile devices.

ScreenShot2012 06 04at92743PM Enforcing Network Policy Internally, Remotely And To Mobile Devices

(Cisco’s Web-Security Portfolio)

A common solution that addresses external devices is VPNs routing traffic through network policy enforcement solutions (example Cisco AnyConnect with Ironport or ScanSafe). An alternative is using sandbox-based methods such as remotely controlling internal machines (example Citrix). Sandboxes work well however may encourage the wrong user behavior such as emailing information to a g-mail account to bypass the sandbox. One solution I like is Cisco’s OEAP which extends the internal network (including corporate SSIDs) to my home office.ScreenShot2012 06 30at110329PM Enforcing Network Policy Internally, Remotely And To Mobile Devices

Agent and cloud based technology can enforce network policy for laptops and desktops however fail for most mobile device types such as androids and apple devices. The reason is most mobile device manufactures give power to the end-user meaning users can opt out of security (more on this HERE). Some MDM vendors such as Zenprise offer the ability to force network traffic through a VPN tunnel, which is great when devices are managed by a MDM provider but fail when the MDM agent is not present. The only protection that can be applied for mobile devices not using MDM is controlling access to sensitive data through data loss prevention, sandbox sessions or encryption technology. I personally like the MDM enforced by Access Control technology approach.

Network policy can be enforced many ways but must meet your overall business goals and extend to all devices regardless of location. The technology is available however requires investment from leadership to properly build a policy and purchase the necessary tools to enforce it. Most failures in network policy are caused by a lack of focus from leadership.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

1 Comment

Filed under General Security, Host And Mobile Device Security

Identifying Advanced Persistent Threats ATP Using Netflow – Lancope StealthWatch Overview And Lab

 Identifying Advanced Persistent Threats ATP Using Netflow   Lancope StealthWatch Overview And LabCisco recently announced a partnership with Lancope to address Advanced Persistent Threat or APT type attacks. The reason Lancope / StealthWatch was added is most security solutions are based on signatures or behavior to identify threats. Some newer technologies are leveraging reputation (see my post HERE) or honey pots (example FireEye) however advanced attacks aka APTs are bypassing these traditional security solutions.

APTs are typically customized for a specific target and designed to stay under the radar using technics such as throttling network usage, communicating through standard ports, encryption and other means that bypass common security solutions. Examples of common security devices are Firewalls, IPS/IDS, Content filters, Anti-Virus / Anti-Malware, and other technologies that operate on a “probe” type design meaning they can only see traffic in a specific network segment. The APT problem becomes difficult to address with traditional tools due to lack of ability to detect the methods APTs operate on the network as well as difficultly to places detection technology in all network areas monitoring all layers of the network stack.

Some recent offerings to combat the APT threat are packet level and flow based monitoring solutions (Lancope being flow based). Both approaches look at all network traffic and flag anomalies that would bypass other security technology.  Both views have pros and cons however one clear advantage of using NetFlow is many network devices are capable of generating flows which makes it more cost effective than capturing and storing packet level data. I’m not saying packet level monitoring is a bad however storage requirements tend to quickly raise the price tag of this approach.

Lancope StealthWatch works by viewing any host with an IP address that creates TCP/IP traffic on the network. Lancope collects metadata on hosts and builds a profile of behavior. Network hosts connected to devices such as switches, routers and firewalls generate flows of information which typically are NetFlow or sFlow. As flows are collected, Lancope aggregates, normalizes and analyzes NetFlow telemetry data to detect threats and suspicious behavior. Lancope can also integrate with Cisco Identity Services Engine aka ISE by taking in contextual information such as User Identity, Endpoint Device Profiling and Posture information. Lancope essentially enables security monitoring on network devices. This dramatically improves the time to identify and react to threats. We had one customer identify some malware that apparently had been active for months throttling its communication phone home patterns to bypass their IPS and SIEM solution.

MY Lancope LAB

When logging into the management interface of Lancope StealthWatch, you first have to launch a Java session.
Screen Shot 2012 05 21 at 5.35.16 PM Identifying Advanced Persistent Threats ATP Using Netflow   Lancope StealthWatch Overview And Lab

Screen Shot 2012 05 21 at 5.37.02 PM Identifying Advanced Persistent Threats ATP Using Netflow   Lancope StealthWatch Overview And Lab

Once launched, the management interface of Lancope looks like this.

Screen Shot 2012 05 21 at 5.38.27 PM Identifying Advanced Persistent Threats ATP Using Netflow   Lancope StealthWatch Overview And Lab

I have specific dashboards that come up which are customizable. Lancope offers TONs of reports that can pop up upon login. NOTE: My Lancope lab is using dummy data. Below is a breakdown of some of that data via the fake hosts, network devices and ISE system.

Screen Shot 2012 05 21 at 5.39.18 PM Identifying Advanced Persistent Threats ATP Using Netflow   Lancope StealthWatch Overview And Lab

This Lancope dashboard shows traffic by hosts and bandwidth usage.

Screen Shot 2012 05 21 at 5.39.39 PM Identifying Advanced Persistent Threats ATP Using Netflow   Lancope StealthWatch Overview And Lab

This shows a flow table in my Lancope lab. Flows are typically one way communications (Cisco ASAs are the only exception). Lancope stitches flows together so admins can easily see the full communication chain between hosts.

Screen Shot 2012 05 21 at 5.39.47 PM Identifying Advanced Persistent Threats ATP Using Netflow   Lancope StealthWatch Overview And Lab

This Lancope diagram shows a global map of host relationship usage.

Screen Shot 2012 05 21 at 5.39.54 PM Identifying Advanced Persistent Threats ATP Using Netflow   Lancope StealthWatch Overview And Lab

Here is a Lancope report showcasing user integration with Cisco Identity Services Engine aka ISE. Notice how inside Lancope, you can see who the users are , where they are located and what type of devices they have on the network utilizing the authorization and profiling capabilities of Cisco ISE.

Screen Shot 2012 05 23 at 4.24.49 PM Identifying Advanced Persistent Threats ATP Using Netflow   Lancope StealthWatch Overview And Lab

The Lancope StealthWatch solution, Cisco NAM and Cisco Identity Services Engine or ISE integration is Cisco’s new flagship story to address advanced cyber threats aka APTs. I believe its critical to monitor flow or packet level data since in many cases, its the only way to identify and defend against advanced threats designed to bypass traditional security products. The scary thing about technology such as Lancope is what you will find when you first set it up in your environment. In many cases, customers find they are already owned and have been for a long time.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (5 votes cast)

4 Comments

Filed under Network Admission Control, Security Management & Analysis

Penetration Testing Tools At Your Next Security Conference – WIFI Pineapple Mark III

pineapple 942x1024 Penetration Testing Tools At Your Next Security Conference – WIFI Pineapple Mark IIIToday’s highlight – WIFI Pineapple Mark III Wireless Penetration Testing Tool.

There are many cool tools sold at conferences. One tool to check out is the WIFI Pineapple Mark III for around $100 dollars. Basically it’s a wireless honeypot using a man-in-the-middle attack to access data. The way it works is it listens for devices calling out for known wireless networks / SSIDs. The WIFI Pineapple will hear the request and clone the requested SSID so the device believes its connecting to a known trusted network.

photo1 1024x768 Penetration Testing Tools At Your Next Security Conference – WIFI Pineapple Mark IIIAn example is connecting an iPad on an airplane to the online network GOGO SSID. Some time later the user may be at a Starbucks and turn on the iPad that was used on the airplane. The iPad will beacon out “am I still on the airplane and can I re-connect to GOGO?”. The WIFI Pineapple will hear the request and reply back  “I’m GOGO … welcome to the internet”. The iPad will auto-connect to the fake GOGO SSID without re-authenticating, which is really the WIFI Pineapple passing traffic through to another network while the hacker sits in the middle. Essentially, the WIFI Pineapple takes advantage of convenience services via auto connecting to known or trusted networks offered by most wireless devices.

The WIFI Pineapple is pretty easy to setup. It has two LAN interfaces (pass through and admin access). It provides auto DHCP 172.16.42.X to the administrative interface. To access the main interface, a GUI located at 172.16.42.1. From here, the pen tester can enable many tools as well as see who is connecting to the WIFI Pineapple. Network setup is pretty easy and designed to pass traffic through without systems knowing the difference from the fake SSID or real network.

Screen Shot 2012 02 07 at 11.41.00 PM Penetration Testing Tools At Your Next Security Conference – WIFI Pineapple Mark IIISome built in tool highlights (in the release of software I’m running) are Karma, Snarf and DNS Spoofing. The GUI is pretty easy to get around. I used the WIFI Pineapple to capture cookies and replay in FireFox via the Add N Edit Cookies plugin. An example is capturing a Facebook cookie to accessing the victim’s Facebook account. An example of using cookies to access a gmail account can be found HERE regarding the cookie reply process.

For those wondering how to defend against this tool there are some options. VPN tunnels encrypt traffic from your device to its destination blocking visibility into traffic seen by the WIFE Pineapple (example using Anyconnect by Cisco). Also using data in motion / encryption technology for sensitive data will defend against this attack since the users must be authenticated to access the data contents that are captured by the man-in-the-middle. Disabling auto-connecting to networks may mean extra steps to establish network connectivity however will help in scenarios like this. The bad part about this attack is you may not auto-connect to known risky networks such as Starbucks however the WIFI Pineapple can clone any SSID including your home network.

Check out Hak5 for more details on this and other cool tools.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)

2 Comments

Filed under Penetration / Hacking, Wireless Topics

Addressing Bring Your Own Device (BYOD): How to manage and secure mobile endpoints

 Addressing Bring Your Own Device (BYOD): How to manage and secure mobile endpointsThe majority of today’s workforce uses multiple devices such as laptops, tablets and smartphones (IE brings their own device or BYOD). Leadership from most industries is being asked to permit these devices on the network in some limited or full fashion. Common BYOD questions are “how do I support growth for users with multiple devices?”, “what type of access should guest and employees use for mobile devices?”, “how do I provision corporate mobile devices?”, and “what security vulnerabilities am I exposed to by permitting mobile devices?”. All are good questions and can be addressed by focusing on three core BYOD concepts: Infrastructure, Access Control and Device Management.

The first thing to consider for BYOD is if your wireless network can support growing from one device per user to potentially 2-4 devices. The best way to find out is by performing a wireless assessment to verify capabilities and potential risks caused by obstacles and nearby rouge networks (IE Starbucks using a similar RFID channel).  Security features such as wireless intrusion detection and prevention (WIDS /WIPS) as well as controlling the number of permitted associated devices per user should be considered for BYOD to guarantee scalability and service.

Another common area of concern for BYOD is provisioning access to employees and guests. The first BYOD question typically asked is “should all mobile devices be handled by a separate network or should employee owned mobile devices share the same core network while guest devices use another network?”. However you plan to permit mobile devices, best practice for BYOD is to automate the process based on multiple factors such as device type, user authentication and risk status. Policies permitting employee access using personal devices should have a process to register and track those devices (IE web registration page like in hotels) rather than an “employee wireless password” that could get compromised and not associated to a device. Many solutions such as Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) offer self-registration to eliminate the need for employee or guest users to deal with an IT member to gain network access. Solutions that leverage profiling technologies can automatically assigned specific access types based operating system, device type and other details (IE provide different access for iPhones and Androids) so you know who and what is on your network. “Knowing is half the battle”, GI JOE Addressing Bring Your Own Device (BYOD): How to manage and secure mobile endpoints


The final piece to the BYOD puzzle is device management. Most mobile hardware vendors give power to device owners meaning Apple, Android, etc. device users can take themselves out of compliance at anytime (blackberry is the only exception). Solutions such as Mobile Iron and AirWatch provide methods to assess devices for high risk factors such as jailbreaking or using unapproved applications which is crucial for BYOD. Application based endpoint management solutions verify devices and either permit or deny corporate services such as providing email based on policy status (IE no email service while angry birds is installed). Common BYOD policies are enforcing the use of passwords, remote locking devices, denying hacked devices, provisioning specific applications and having the ability to remote wipe only corporate data. The mobile security market leaders offer a breath of operating systems and hardware options as well as easy methods to communicate when end users fall out of compliance.

 Addressing Bring Your Own Device (BYOD): How to manage and secure mobile endpointsIndustry leaders for security are focusing on BYOD by developing solutions for mobile devices. RSA and Symantec recently released data loss prevention (DLP) for mobile devices to deny sensitive information such as social security numbers from moving to or from mobile devices. Network vendors such as Cisco are partnering with mobile manufactures to address BYOD by offering VPN technology that encrypt traffic from mobile devices while off the corporate network. There are many options for endpoint security when looking at BYOD, which the investment for mobile security should match protecting laptops and desktops regardless if the employee owns the asset.
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)

5 Comments

Filed under Bring Your Own Device BYOD, Host And Mobile Device Security, Network Admission Control

Securing Teleworkers: Building A Remote Access Solution For Teleworking

sales working at home office 300x199 Securing Teleworkers: Building A Remote Access Solution For Teleworking
Securing Teleworkers is at the top of the to do list for many organizations. President Obama signed a bill aimed to significantly boost teleworking by federal employees. There are lots of business benefits from teleworking however permitting remote access to internal resources increases risk. Here are some tips to consider when securing your teleworkers.

The most common method for Securing Teleworkers is using a Virtual Private Network (VPN). The concept is establishing an encrypted tunnel between remote endpoints and the internal network so endpoints are serviced like an internal resource. Leading vendors utilize endpoint agents or web-based VPN portals that control what can be accessed. Best practice is to adjust the level of access based on how users authenticate, data being accessed and network they are connecting from. Strong solutions auto establish VPN connections outside the cooperate network and scan endpoints for key loggers prior to permitting access.

A popular enhancement to Securing Teleworkers through a VPN is Network Access Control (NAC) technology. NAC verifies who is accessing the network, captures information about the devices and distributes access based on policy. NAC is like airport security verifying people’s identity and risk level BEFORE permitted access to the plane. Best practice is to increase policy requirements as you increase access rights. For example, permit employees if they are using cooperate laptops with a specific version of antivirus while limit contractors with any version of antivirus. Automating remediation for teleworkers who don’t meet policy is key to reducing NAC trouble tickets.
500x amazing girl quits 282 300x199 Securing Teleworkers: Building A Remote Access Solution For Teleworking
Another recommended solution for securing teleworkers is filtering all VPN traffic through a Content Filter. Content Filters enforce web usage policies such as denying adult websites or tracking hours wasted on social networks. Research shows users involved with popular social media games like Farmville spend hours each day that may take place during business hours if not tracked. Leading Content Filters also offer security features to protect users from malicious websites that aim to breach the internal network through compromised workstations.

UltraLevel vdi 300x225 Securing Teleworkers: Building A Remote Access Solution For Teleworking
A popular alternative to using VPN solutions for Securing Teleworkers is adopting a virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI). Data is kept on the protected network and accessed through a server-client model. The security benefit is clients never directly access the inside network so risk of infection is reduced. A common obstacle for virtual desktop infrastructures is user demands for direct access to data. Permitting direct access could jeopardize VDI benefits unless proper access control and data security transfer methods such as encryption are enforced.

Other options to consider for securing teleworkers are Data Loss Prevention (DLP), host security applications, encryption, and patch management solutions. Best practice recommends DLP for endpoints, email, network and servers that have access to sensitive data. Encrypting sensitive data can add a lot of value as long access rights are enforced. Hardening endpoints with features like disabling wireless when physically connected, limiting USB access to approved devices, forcing sensitive data through encrypted channels and updating endpoints without user intervention is important. The best way to manage security features like these is to limit remote access to corporate issued devices. It’s also a good idea to have all teleworkers sign an agreement specifying your telework policies prior to permitting remote access.

There are many solutions for Securing Teleworkers so it’s important to understand your business operations before selecting a technology. Rushing into a technology could expose your organization to unnecessary risk or an unreliable solution.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)

Leave a Comment

Filed under General Security, Network Admission Control