Tag Archives: security apps

Web Security Offerings From Cisco: Comparing Cisco NEW CX to IronPort Web Security Appliance WSA

 Web Security Offerings From Cisco: Comparing Cisco NEW CX to IronPort Web Security Appliance WSAToday’s Internet is a dangerous place. Imagine a small village with law and order surrounded by a wall keeping out miles of ungoverned ruthless territory. Most known websites surfed daily by your users make up a small percentage of the total Internet. The remaining 80% or more of uncategorized websites are contaminated with Botnets, malware and short-lived websites targeting your users. Many of these malicious websites are embedded in trusted sites such as social networks by hiding in advertisements or silly links posted by your friends. The best protection for this threat vector is limiting Internet usage to trusted websites and monitoring those websites for malicious applications.

The most common method to protect users while surfing the Internet is leveraging a web security solution. I wrote a post about this HERE. Cisco has two web security flavors, which are a dedicated proxy and application firewall add-on. The dedicated proxy, known as the Web Security Appliance (WSA) came from the acquisition of IronPort. Cisco replaced its content filter module for their ASA firewalls based on McAfee technology with an application aware addition known as CX Context-Aware. There are many overlapping features between the two approaches however there is a clear distinction when to choose one over the other.

Both CX and WSA provide features expected from a web security solution. Both CX and WSA offer the ability to monitor and control what type of websites are available for users based on categories (examples Adult, Hate, Gambling, etc.). Both CX and WSA include reputation controls meaning ability to blacklist known malicious websites (more on reputation HERE). Both CX and WSA can limit or deny traffic types based on user groups such as denying Skype, throttle download speeds and target specific applications (example permitting Facebook while denying Farmsville for employees 9am-5pm). Both solutions can scale beyond the internal network using VPNs to route traffic from remote users.

CX DASHBOARD (click to see larger)

Screen Shot 2012 08 01 at 7.50.08 PM Web Security Offerings From Cisco: Comparing Cisco NEW CX to IronPort Web Security Appliance WSAScreen Shot 2012 08 01 at 7.50.19 PM Web Security Offerings From Cisco: Comparing Cisco NEW CX to IronPort Web Security Appliance WSA

CX Web Categories

Screen Shot 2012 08 01 at 7.51.52 PM Web Security Offerings From Cisco: Comparing Cisco NEW CX to IronPort Web Security Appliance WSA

IronPort WSA Categories

Screen Shot 2012 08 01 at 9.58.33 PM Web Security Offerings From Cisco: Comparing Cisco NEW CX to IronPort Web Security Appliance WSA

WSA Reputation Score Settings

Screen Shot 2012 08 01 at 10.03.40 PM Web Security Offerings From Cisco: Comparing Cisco NEW CX to IronPort Web Security Appliance WSA

Features offered by IronPort not included with CX are focused on what happens after traffic passes reputation and content policies. WSA offers anti-malware scanning licenses for McAfee, Sophos and Webroot for any traffic tagged as “grey” meaning traffic that passes the reputation blacklist but not considered completely trusted or “white-listed”. These signature-based verdict engines are licensed separately and can be stacked to provide a wide range of scanning capability. WSA also offers a dedicated layer 4 Botnet scanner targeting phone home communication from infected machines. These additional features provide more layers of defense beyond common application firewall technologies including Cisco CX.

Some other differences are based on the design and implantation of WSA and CX. The WSA is a dedicated proxy, which can be deployed using host inline proxy settings or directing network traffic to the WSA using WCCP. The CX uses policy maps routing traffic seen by an ASA through the CX addition. WSA includes caching to improve network performance. WSA can direct traffic through a DLP solution adding network based DLP scanning (A possible roadmap is including DLP in the appliance as a add-on license similar to the IronPort Email Security Appliance). Cisco roadmaps show IronPort offerings will include a virtualized option in the near future. Probably the most important CX design consideration is today Cisco ASA 5500X can either leverage CX or IPS however not both simultaneously. CX is also not available on some ASA 5500X models such as 5585-40s and 5585-60s. Expanding CX to other ASA models and dual IPS CX support are roadmap items at this time.

Screen Shot 2012 08 14 at 10.37.48 AM Web Security Offerings From Cisco: Comparing Cisco NEW CX to IronPort Web Security Appliance WSATo summarize, its best to consider Cisco CX for essential web security meaning content filtering and reputation based protection. The CX is also a viable option if you don’t require IPS from your ASA 5500X. WSA is suited for Comprehensive web security meaning content filtering, reputation protection, malware scanning and layer 4 botnet awareness. WSA is also a dedicated proxy providing performance benefits as well as design options such as including Data Loss Prevention. If you desire your ASA to include IPS functionality, today you will need to consider a WSA to handle web security. Hopefully this post helps with distinguishing when to choose CX or IronPort WSA.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)

2 Comments

Filed under Internet Defense

Securing Mobile Devices: How To Secure The iPad 2, iPhone, and Android

 Securing Mobile Devices: How To Secure The iPad 2, iPhone, and Android
IPads and iPhones are pretty awesome. They are slick looking and fun to play with. My friend’s Android is pretty cool as well. I had to find an app that gave my iPhone a slider login to counter his coolness. Regardless of the cool factor, many agencies are afraid these devices bring lots of risk if permitted on the cooperate network.

As C-level executives / high-ranking commanders get their hands on fancy mobile devices, they start to demand for a policy to bring mobile devices onto the network.

My recommendation to secure mobile devices is to look at this from two sides:

1) NETWORK: How do I provision network access for approved and non-approved mobile devices?

2) END POINT: How do I manage approved mobile devices such as enforcing polices around what applications are used, avoiding jail broken devices, etc.

To answer question 1, the best way to look at this is as an access control problem. Many customers I have worked with provision non-approved devices on a limited network through the use of VLAN redirection, ACLs or separate wireless SSID. For cooperate issued devices, they leverage authentication to see if the user is approved and scan for policy checks to verify the device is safe before provisioning access. Failure to meet these checks either defaults the device to the guest network, limits the cooperate access or completely denies the device. Some examples of access control solutions are Cisco ISE, Cisco NAC appliance and Forscout.

To answer question 2, this comes down to end point management. Vendors like Symantec offer mobile device management solutions, which offer an agent to enforce policy. They have features like password enforcement, remote wiping only corporate data (key for not upsetting users violating policy), checking for jailbreaks, and offering additional authentication methods.

The final point I’ll bring up is its best practice to enforce the end point management piece through the access control solution. For example, develop a policy that looks for an iPad and checks for who is authenticated as well as if the end point management agent is installed, up to date and running. As long as the end point management agent is doing its job, you know the iPad is used by a approved user and is not brining on additional risk since it meets all cooperate policies enforced by the end point management agent. There are many ways to design this type of solution but hopefully this helps understand how to approach this situation from a high level viewpoint.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 4.5/5 (2 votes cast)

3 Comments

Filed under Bring Your Own Device BYOD, Host And Mobile Device Security