Tag Archives: audit

Defining The Difference Between A Penetration Test, Vulnerability Assessment and Security Audit

 Defining The Difference Between A Penetration Test, Vulnerability Assessment and Security AuditThe terms Penetration Test, Vulnerability Assessment and Security Audit are often blended together when requested by clients or offered by security service providers. All three terms have security aspects however are very different regarding what purpose they serve as well as the expected deliverable.

 Defining The Difference Between A Penetration Test, Vulnerability Assessment and Security Audit

A Security Audit typically means evaluating a system or application’s risk level against a set of standards or baselines. Standards are mandatory rules while baselines are the minimal acceptable level of security. Standards and baselines achieve consistency in security implementations and can be specific to industries, technologies and processes.

Most requests for Security Audits are focused on passing an official audit (IE preparing for a corporate or government audit) or proving the baseline requirements are met for a mandatory set of regulations (HIPAA, PCI, etc.). In many cases, Security Audit services do not include any level of insurance or protection if an audit isn’t successful post services meaning services will only provide information that a client can use to become compliant.

IMPORTANT: In many cases, security audits give customers a false sense of security. Most standards and baselines have a long update process that is unable to keep up with the rapid changes in threats found in today’s cyber world. It is highly recommended to go beyond standards and baselines to raise the level of security to an acceptable level of protection for real world threats.

 Defining The Difference Between A Penetration Test, Vulnerability Assessment and Security AuditA Vulnerability Assessment is the process in which network devices, operating systems and application software are scanned in order to identify the presence of known and unknown vulnerabilities. A vulnerability is a gap, error or weakness in how a system is designed, used and protected. When a vulnerability is exploited, it can result in giving unauthorized access, escalation of privileges or denial-of-service to the asset.

Vulnerability Assessments typically stop once a vulnerability is found meaning services doesn’t include executing an attack against the vulnerability to verify if it’s legitimate. A Vulnerability Assessment deliverable provides potential risk associated with all vulnerabilities found with possible remediation steps. There are many tools that can be used to scan for vulnerabilities based on system type, operating system, ports open for communication and other means. Vulnerability Assessments are a valuable way to assess a network for potential security weakness to identify where to invest for future security.

 Defining The Difference Between A Penetration Test, Vulnerability Assessment and Security AuditA Penetration Test is attempting to attack vulnerabilities in a similar method of a real malicious attacker. Typically, penetration services are requested when a system or network has exhausted investments in security and seeking to verify if all avenues of security have been covered. The key difference between a Penetration Test and Vulnerability Assessment is a penetration test will act upon vulnerabilities found and verify if they are legit reducing the list of confirmed risk associated with a target.

IMPORTANT: One popular misconception is a Penetration Testing service enhances IT security since services have a higher cost associated than other security services. Penetration Testing does not make IT networks more secure since services evaluates existing security! A customer should not consider a penetration test if there is a belief the target is not completely secure.

Hopefully these definitions help define future security service requests.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

1 Comment

Filed under General Security

Enforcing Network Policy Internally, Remotely And To Mobile Devices

 Enforcing Network Policy Internally, Remotely And To Mobile DevicesMany corporations fail to establish and enforce a network policy. A network policy is a set of conditions, limitations, and customized settings designed to control how authorized subjects use network resources. Common examples of a network policy are controlling access to adult, gambling, hacking, blacklisted and other website categories that violate human resource (HR) and security standards. Network Policy requirements can change based on device type, time of day and user role. Its key that network policy is automatically enforced rather than something end-users choose to abide by or most likely will fail when most needed.

Users are the weakest link in any network. Hackers know this and target the majority of attacks at this vulnerability. I constantly hear customers complain about phishing attacks (users clicking a link in a email) or users bringing devices infected with malware most likely obtained while surfing websites that violate network policy. Its also common to see users violate security controls if it impacts their work flow. I had one audit identify internal users VPNing from their workstations to bypass internal network policy due to lack of controls for remote users. Poorly enforced policies will impact your security, reduce workflow and become very costly as a result of failed audits and compromised systems.

Common solutions for enforcing network policy are layer 7 / application layer firewalls, content filters and bolt-on technology such as cloud applications or agent technology that control network traffic from end-points. I wrote a post about the concepts behind web-gateway solutions HERE. The standard offering provides content categories (Gambling, Social Networks, Hate, Sex, etc.) that can be denied, limited or monitored. The more advanced solutions include security components such as anti-virus / anti-malware, layer-4 monitoring, website reputation scoring and other features.

The problem with these solutions is scalability. Most content filers require either user devices to be configured inline (hardcoding proxy settings) or routing traffic to the device (example WCCP). These solutions become difficult to enforce outside of the internal network as well as on devices that are not cooperate assets such as mobile devices.

ScreenShot2012 06 04at92743PM Enforcing Network Policy Internally, Remotely And To Mobile Devices

(Cisco’s Web-Security Portfolio)

A common solution that addresses external devices is VPNs routing traffic through network policy enforcement solutions (example Cisco AnyConnect with Ironport or ScanSafe). An alternative is using sandbox-based methods such as remotely controlling internal machines (example Citrix). Sandboxes work well however may encourage the wrong user behavior such as emailing information to a g-mail account to bypass the sandbox. One solution I like is Cisco’s OEAP which extends the internal network (including corporate SSIDs) to my home office.ScreenShot2012 06 30at110329PM Enforcing Network Policy Internally, Remotely And To Mobile Devices

Agent and cloud based technology can enforce network policy for laptops and desktops however fail for most mobile device types such as androids and apple devices. The reason is most mobile device manufactures give power to the end-user meaning users can opt out of security (more on this HERE). Some MDM vendors such as Zenprise offer the ability to force network traffic through a VPN tunnel, which is great when devices are managed by a MDM provider but fail when the MDM agent is not present. The only protection that can be applied for mobile devices not using MDM is controlling access to sensitive data through data loss prevention, sandbox sessions or encryption technology. I personally like the MDM enforced by Access Control technology approach.

Network policy can be enforced many ways but must meet your overall business goals and extend to all devices regardless of location. The technology is available however requires investment from leadership to properly build a policy and purchase the necessary tools to enforce it. Most failures in network policy are caused by a lack of focus from leadership.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

1 Comment

Filed under General Security, Host And Mobile Device Security